Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Beasley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1981No. 1763PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

This appeal raises the question of the adequacy of notice to the debtors of the intent to foreclose before a foreclosure sale. Appellants, Joe Martinez, Jr., et ux., brought suit to set aside the trustee’s sale of their residence on the theory that one certified letter addressed to “Mr. & Mrs. Joe Martinez, Jr.” did not give sufficient notice to “... each debtor obligated to pay such debt ...” of the sale under Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 3810 (1980). The trial court denied all relief prayed for by the appellants. We affirm.

The only issue before us is whether one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hausmann v. Texas Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dillard v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Lambert v. First National Bank of BowieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Deposit Insurance Bridge Bank, N.A. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Dillard v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Gary Kainer v. ABMC Corporation and Union Planters Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API