Legal Opinion

E.G.M. v. BRUCE SCOTT, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 3, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00744Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 E.G.M., CASE NO. C26-0744-KKE 8 Petitioner(s), ORDER GRANTING HABEAS PETITION 9 v. 10 BRUCE SCOTT, et al., 11 Respondent(s). 12 After Petitioner was arrested and detained by United States Immigration and Customs 13 Enforcement (“ICE”) agents, he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.SC. § 2241. 14 Dkt. No. 1. His petition argues that his detention is unlawful because it violates his constitutional 15 right to procedural due process. Id. at 9. The Government1 filed its return, arguing that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API