Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Sanders

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1999No. 97-323Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Gray

¶39 I agree with the Court that the District Court abused its discretion in not allowing Sanders to withdraw his guilty plea, but join in Justice Nelson’s special concurring opinion which relates to the actual rule of law in Bowley.

¶40 I write separately, however, to question the alternative relief granted to Sanders by the Court. Sanders attempted to withdraw his guilty plea, and we have held that the District Court erred in refusing to allow him to do so. Under that circumstance, the sole appropriate relief seemingly would be to remand to the District Court with instructions to allow…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. OwensMontana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API