Neal v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review proceedings denying a rehearing before the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioner in the above-entitled case seeks a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings wherein, on his application to the respondent above named for a rehearing, his petition was denied. It appears from the petition herein that the order denying the rehearing of which petitioner makes complaint was made and entered December 22, 1917. Section 67(a) of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act of 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 875) provides that “within thirty days after the application for a rehearing is denied, or, if the application is granted, within thirty days after…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Alford v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Di Paolo v. Calumet & Arizona Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Southwest Airlines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.