Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING STATEMENT
JUSTICE WECHT
The Court dismisses this appeal as improvidently granted, because a majority of Justices now have concluded that the case presents a poor vehicle by which to review the use of hearsay evidence at preliminary hearings. The Court has determined that, because the Commonwealth introduced some non-hearsay evidence at David Rick-er’s preliminary hearing, we should await a case in which the issue is more suitably presented. I respectfully disagree.
The Commonwealth’s prima fade case was premised upon, and, for all practical purposes constructed entirely by, Trooper…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.