Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2017No. 41 MAP 2016Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING STATEMENT

JUSTICE WECHT

The Court dismisses this appeal as improvidently granted, because a majority of Justices now have concluded that the case presents a poor vehicle by which to review the use of hearsay evidence at preliminary hearings. The Court has determined that, because the Commonwealth introduced some non-hearsay evidence at David Rick-er’s preliminary hearing, we should await a case in which the issue is more suitably presented. I respectfully disagree.

The Commonwealth’s prima fade case was premised upon, and, for all practical purposes constructed entirely by, Trooper…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API