Baisch v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
Taxpayers, who are limited partners in Bakersfield Associates (Bakersfield), an Oregon limited partnership, appeal from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court. The Tax Court held that a 1982 Bakersfield sale and leaseback of commercial property was a “sham” and, consequently, disallowed all deductions on taxpayers’ personal income tax returns for 1982 through 1984 that were attributable to taxpayers’ investments in that transaction. On de novo review, ORS 305.445, we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The complex transaction that is at the core of this dispute began with four individual sales to four…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reed v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Realty Group, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Surtees v. VFJ Ventures, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Combs v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Khalaf v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.