Legal Opinion

Castano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 21, 2012No. SC11-1571PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In Castano v. State, 65 So.3d 546 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of Claudia Ver-gara Castano’s postconviction motion. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. In this timely filed initial postconviction motion, Castaño raised the same claim raised in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), which held that defense counsel was deficient for failing to advise his client of mandatory deportation consequences for pleading guilty. Castano’s postconviction proceeding was pending when the United States…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Castano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Dominguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  5. Jose Martinez Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API