Legal Opinion

(HC) Davis v. Peery

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 19, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01895Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCUS JAMAL DAVIS, No. 2:16-CV-1895-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 14 SUZANNE M. PEERY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition 18 for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254.1

Pursuant to the written consent of all 19 parties (ECF Nos. 5 and 12), this case is before the undersigned judge for all purposes, including 20 entry of a final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Pending before the court…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API