Legal Opinion
Conley v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided October 6, 1997No. 1:92CV25-DJSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
978 F.Supp. 892 (1997)
Donald E. CONLEY, Plaintiff,
v.
PITNEY BOWES, INC., Pitney Bowes Long Term Disability Plan, George B. Harvey, Carmine F. Adimando, and Allan A. Crystal, as Trustees of Pitney Bowes Long Term Disability Plan, Defendants,
and
Pitney Bowes Group Life Insurance Plan, Pitney Bowes Retirement Plan, Pitney Bowes Major Medical Expense Plan and Pitney Bowes Dental Expense Plan, Defendant Parties-in-Interest.
No. 1:92CV25-DJS.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division.
July 30, 1997.
Order Denying Stay October 6, 1997.
S. Sheldon Weinhaus, Weinhaus and Dobson, St.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Jane Donaho v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as Plan Administrator of the Fmc Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Doloros Donatelli v. The Home Insurance Company, Cooper Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Howard E. Cox v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. Retirement Plan Northern Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Conley v. Pitney BowesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Donald E. Conley v. Pitney BowesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States of America, Ex rel. Raju A.T. Dahlstrom v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019