Legal Opinion

Mathesen v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 24, 1947Published

1Per curiam

Memorandum In determining whether reasonable care has been used by the city in clearing streets and walks after a snowfall, it is proper to consider the amount of snow required to be moved, the number of miles of sidewalk and roadway, the means and methods used to remove the snow and the condition of the sidewalks in the immediate vicinity. It was error to exclude evidence as to these matters. (See Reutlinger v. City of New York, 255 App. Div. 848, affd. 281 N. Y. 592; Shyatt v. City of New York, 283 N. Y. 709.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reutlinger v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Reutlinger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Sturman v. New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API