Legal Opinion

Corliss Lamont and Margaret I. Lamont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 17, 1964No. 28902_1PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Chief Judge:

At issue in this petition are tax deductions claimed by taxpayer Corliss Lamont 1 as losses from his professional activities in the taxable year 1957. The Tax Court of the United States, Withey, J., disallowed the deductions, and upheld the Commissioner’s assessment of a $5,286.84 deficiency in taxpayer’s income taxes for that year. It found that Lamont’s activities as a teacher, writer, publisher, and lecturer were not carried on as a trade or business within the meaning of that term as used in §§ 162(a) and 165 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 2 permitting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Clement L. Hirsch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Ullman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Jasionowski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Margit Sigray Bessenyey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. The State of New York v. The Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Lemmen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. Mendes v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API