Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Dayton Suregrip & Shore Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The trial court properly denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict as against the weight of the evidence. There was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s conclusion that the wedge which caused plaintiff’s injury was not supplied by the named defendants. The verdict should not be set aside unless the evidence preponderates so greatly in plaintiff’s favor that the jury could not have reached its conclusion based on any fair interpretation of the evidence (McDowell v Di Pronio, 52 AD2d 749). The jury was entitled to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Di PronioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Pertofsky v. DrucksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. Reilly v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Schein v. Chest Service Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Dunne v. LembergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Virgo v. BonavillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Holtz v. AldridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API