Legal Opinion

Lake Street Sash & Door Co. v. Verin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1926No. 25,736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action on a promissory note, wherein after trial without a jury defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for amended findings or a new trial.

A very brief statement of the case is sufficient to show that the iearned trial judge was right in finding against defendants on their one defense of usury. In December, 1923, Standard Home Building Company, a corporation, owed plaintiff $4,653.98. The claim was rendered secure by a mechanic’s lien upon an apartment house property. At that time the defendants Verin were indebted to Mr. Gruesner, president of the Standard Home Building…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Gibson v. FristoeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1797
  3. Grymes v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1797
  4. Scanlan v. GrimmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Alt v. BanholzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Stinson v. BisbeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Allroggen v. A. C. Carter & Northeast Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API