Legal Opinion

Painter v. Fletcher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1909No. 16,149PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Ford district court; Gordon L. Finley, judge.

1Per curiam

When the court found all the facts in this case to be as the plaintiff contends, and found the affirmative defenses of the answer to be untrue, no course was open but to decree specific performance. The evidence fully supports the judgment. Read in the light of the situation and circumstances of the parties, which may always be considered, the description was sufficiently definite and the contract did not need reformation ; therefore, error could not be committed in reforming it. If, as the defendants contend, the contract gave the vendee an option, it was not necessary that the vendee’s wife…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Turon State Bank v. BozarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. North River Insurance v. Aetna Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. S. H. Reno v. Ralph G. Beckett and Elizabeth G. Beckett, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  4. Arnett v. WescottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Golden v. ClaudelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API