Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1987No. 1185S469PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeBRULER, Justice.

This is a direct appeal following conviction by a jury of the offense of armed robbery, a class B felony, and theft, a class D felony. Appellant received concurrent sentences of 15 years and 2 years respectively.

There are two issues presented for review: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s pre-trial motion to suppress identification testimony; and (2) whether a separate or independent basis existed to allow direct in-court testimony identifying appellant as the assailant.

These are the facts from the record which tend to support the determination of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Swope v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gambill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gillie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Wethington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Brooks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Eric Rasnick v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API