Aiken v. Hackett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are (or were) police officers for the City of Memphis, Tennessee (the “City”). Appellants are white. They appeal the district court’s entry of partial summary judgment against them in this case about the City’s affirmative-action program and police promotions. The federal district court entered partial summary judgment for the City because the court concluded that Appellants could not show *518the injury in fact necessary for Article III standing. That judgment became final when the district court entered an order dismissing the case in its entirety. We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Texas v. LesageSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brunet v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Ashton v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
3Cited by13 opinions
- Donahue v. Boston, City OfCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Braunstein v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Cotter v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY v. ZaringKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Kim Carroll v. Eva HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.