Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1923No. 5 Div. 475PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSTEE,‘J.

Appellant (defendant in the court below) was convicted of violation of the prohibition law on an indictment containing two counts, the first count charging the manufacture of prohibited liquors and the second count charging possessing a still, etc.

The evidence for the state tended to show that a still complete, except for the worm, with about 200.'gallons of beer, was found at a distance of from 200 .to 250 yardá from the defendant’s house; that a road led from the defendant’s house by the still to a coal kiln; that charcoal was found at the still; that there were wagon tracks along…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Newell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Watts v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Dawkins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Glover v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API