Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1984PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.

Appellant’s contention that the evidence failed to establish a prima facie case of liability must be rejected. It was not disputed that the bus and the bicycle on which plaintiff was riding collided. There was evidence from which the jury could have concluded that the bus hit the bicycle. There was also evidence from which the jury could have concluded, in the circumstances, that it was negligent on the part of defendant not to have equipped…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Daliendo v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Wilson v. BodianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Clarke v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Van Syckle v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Levbarg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API