Crossman v. Pendery
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This cause is submitted upon an agreed state of facts, to the effect that the ground in controversy is covered by the surface lines of the Orion claim, located by plaintiff, and also, of the Pendery claim, located by defendant; that both locations are regular as to form; that the Orion was first located, surveyed and staked; that the locators have steadily prosecuted work in the development thereof, and have discovered mineral in place; that the discoverers of the Pendery, located subsequently to the Orion, and while the locators, of the latter were in possession thereof, also prosecuted work…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Cook v. KlonosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- United States v. HurstDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1924
- Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1965
- Johanson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.