Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Goodman Distribution, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 17, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02776Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIN CHRISTENSEN, No. 2:18-cv-02776-MCE-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 GOODMAN DISTRIBUTION INC., et al., (ECF Nos. 33, 40, 42.) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel the production of an unredacted 18 copy of an investigation report. (ECF No. 33.) A hearing was held on plaintiff’s motion; Andrea 19 Rosa appeared for plaintiff and Phillip Ebsworth appeared for defendant. (ECF No. 44.) Upon 20 review of the record and the parties’ arguments, the court DENIES…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.