Legal Opinion
In Re Constitutionality of ORS 456.720
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1975PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.
This is an original proceeding brought in this court as provided in Chapter 97, Oregon Laws 1975, to determine the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Oregon Housing Act, ORS 456.550 to 456.720. Petitioner, respondent, and amicus curiae Blyth Eastman Dillon & Company contend that the provisions in question are constitutional. Rex Gibson and Norma Paulus, appearing as “interested persons,” take the contrary view. We shall refer to Gibson and Paulus as intervenors.
The 1973 Oregon Legislature enacted the Oregon Housing Act, ORS 456.550 to 456.720, the purpose of which is to assist in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Johnson v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of PA 1966, No 346Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency v. New England Merchants National Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- John R. Grubb, Inc. v. Iowa Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- In the Matter of Constitutionality of Chapter 280, Or. Laws 1975Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Infants v. Virginia Housing Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.