Legal Opinion

Fink v. Fink

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The plaintiff wife seeks to reach the income of a so-called “ spendthrift trust ” of which the defendant husband is beneficiary, so as to apply part of the proceeds to the satisfaction of alimony awarded to her pendente lite, as well as for certain arrears of such alimony now existing. In Wetmore v. Wetmore (149 N. Y. 520, 529) the power of equity to direct payment of alimony out of a similar trust was upheld and the ruling is not to be limited, as defendant urges, by the fact that the wife in the case at bar has as yet only an interim order and not a final judgment. The rule depends, not on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Zwingmann v. ZwingmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. McGlynn v. McGlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schwager v. SchwagerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of BoissevainNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  3. Clarke v. ClarkeNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Clarke v. ClarkeNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Fink v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API