United States v. Craig A. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
Craig Smith appeals his conviction for witness retaliation under 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b) following a jury trial. Smith contends on appeal that: (1) the indictment charging him is insufficient as a matter of law, (2) the district court erred by excluding from evidence the victim’s misdemeanor convictions, and (3) by substituting a juror outside of Smith’s presence, the court violated his right to be present at all stages of the criminal proceedings. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On the evening of October 30, 1998, Craig Smith accosted Timothy Heater…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Romanelli, Ronald v. Suliene, DaliaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Matthew JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. John D. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.