Legal Opinion

Teague Investment Co. v. Setchel

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1919No. Civ. No. 3077PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in an action brought by it to recover the sum of $5,784, with interest, costs, and counsel fees, alleged to have become due said plaintiff by reason of defendant’s failure to perform the terms of a certain contract for the purchase from said plaintiff of certain real estate.

The facts of the case are briefly these: On December 1, 1913, the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing for the sale by the former and purchase by the latter of a certain tract of land in the county of Fresno for the sum of $6,603, of which sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ehrhart v. MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ocean Shore Development Co. v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. StahlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Ratterree Land Co. v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API