Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Wells Fargo Bank (In Re Churchill Nut Co.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided July 26, 2000No. 14-53705PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARILYN MORGAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Boeger Family Farms (“Boe-ger”) for summary judgment. The underlying complaint was brought by the Trustee to determine the validity, extent and priority of liens against proceeds from the sale of Churchill Nut’s walnut inventory. Boeger seeks a finding that it holds a superior interest in the sales proceeds, while the Trustee contends that Boeger shares pro rata with over 100 walnut growers. The Court concludes that Boeger’s prepetition exercise of its state law remedies did not terminate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re Bullion Reserve of North America, a California Corporation, Curtis B. Danning, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Theodore P. BozekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. In the Matter of William J. Stoecker, Debtor. Appeal of Thomas E. Raleigh, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of William J. StoeckerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coles v. GlaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. In Re HernandezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API