Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Town of Pittsfield

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 13, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs Cindy and Tim Gregory brought an action in Superior Court (Somerset County) that, inter alia, claimed, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1981), that defendants Town of Pittsfield and its town manager violated their federal constitution al rights to procedural due process in that the Town denied the Gregorys general assistance benefits without adhering to Maine’s statutory procedures. Plaintiffs also sought attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1981). They now appeal from the Superior Court’s summary judgment dismissing both claims with prejudice. We deny the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Jackson v. Inhabitants of Town of SearsportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lila M. Mallette v. Arlington County Employees' Supplemental Retirement System II Arlington County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. Munjoy Sporting & Athletic Club v. DowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Moreau v. Town of TurnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Bushey v. Town of ChinaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API