Legal Opinion

Heath & Co. v. Greifzu

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 1989No. 88-2191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEHMER, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation case the employer, Heath & Company, and the carrier, The Travelers Insurance Company, have appealed the award of temporary total disability benefits to claimant William Greif-zu.

There is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the award of benefits, and we affirm that point without discussion.

Appellants also argue that the deputy commissioner erred in ordering payment for the unauthorized services of the psychiatrist, Dr. Lakdawala. Dr. Lakdawala saw claimant on nine occasions between November 20, 1987 and January 25, 1988, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuchs Baking Co. v. Estate of SzlosekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Cedars of Lebanon Health Care Center, Inc. v. SummersetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Vannice Const. Co. v. SilvermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pan American Hospital v. FleitasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Venice Nursing Pavilion v. WalchleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API