Hicks v. Hicks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
There is no merit to the father’s contention that the Support Magistrate erred in entering an order of support without knowledge of the father’s income (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c] [1], [2]; cf. § 424-a [b]). Where, as here, there is insufficient evidence to determine gross income, the Child Support Standards Act provides that “the court shall order child support based upon the needs or standard of living of the child, whichever is greater” (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [k]; see Matter of Tsarova v Tsarov, 59 AD3d 632 [2009]). The Support Magistrate properly determined the amount of support…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Svitlana Volodymyrivna Tsarova v. Mikhailo Viktorovych TsarovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Forman v. FrostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Genender v. GenenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Betancourt v. BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Corr v. CorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Suyunov v. TarashchanskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lorys v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Toumazatos v. ToumazatosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Burris v. BurrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Suffolk County Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Calliendo v. BlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.