Legal Opinion

Benrus Watch Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 30, 1964No. C.D. 2469PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawRENCe, Judge:

This cause of action presents for our determination the question whether the collector of customs properly withheld delivery to the plaintiffs of certain watch movements, imported from Switzerland, on the ground that they were not accurately marked, as required by applicable provisions of the statute quoted, infra.

The jurisdiction of the court was invoked by the protests specified below, duly filed pursuant to. section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1514), which were consolidated for trial:

Protest 62/1791 — Benrus Watch Company, Inc.

Protest 62/1792 — Wittnauer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. H. Bayersdorfer & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. W. N. Proctor & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Rolex Watch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Concord Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Concord Watch. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Jean R. Graef, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API