Haas v. Weinhagen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Cb’cuit Court for Washington County. Motion to re-instate appeal. The grounds of the motion appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLyoN, J.
This is a motion to re-instate an appeal which was dismissed by the respondent for want of a return, pursuant to Rule 4 of this court.
The action was commenced in the circuit court for Washington county, and on the petition of the respondent, the place cf trial was changed to Milwaukee county. After the record was transmitted to the circuit court for the latter county, the defendant appealed from the order awarding such change of the place of trial and served a notice of appeal and an undertaking upon the clerk of each of said circuit courts. After the clerk of the circuit court for Milwaukee…
2Cited by8 opinions
- White v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
- Robertson Lumber Co. v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Schattschneider v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Greeley v. WinsorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- North Hudson Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. ChildsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.