Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schottel v. Harman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 19, 2006No. SC 87857PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Wilbur Schottel (“Relator”) seeks discharge from confinement as a sexually violent predator (“SVP”) pursuant to section 632.498, RSMo 2000. He asks this Court to prohibit the Respondent from applying section 632.498, RSMo Supp.2006, the amended version of the statute that became effective in June 2006, to his original petition for release filed in 2002. This Court holds that section 632.498, RSMo Supp.2006, applies to Relator’s case. The preliminary writ of mandamus previously issued in this matter is quashed.

Background

Relator was committed as a SVP in 2000 and filed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Squaw Creek Drainage District v. TurneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v. Hazardous Waste Management CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Fisher v. Reorganized School District No. R-V of Grundy CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Care and Treatment of Schottel v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Care and Treatment of CoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Accident Fund Ins. Co. v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  3. In re: Matthew J. King v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Pavia v. Smitty's SupermarketMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Care & Treatment of Warren v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API