Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stahl v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 12, 1948No. 15,909Published

1DissentJustice Hays

I am unable to agree with the conclusions of the court as expressed in the majority opinion and therefore dissent.

The court reverses the judgment of the trial court for the reason, as stated, that certain instructions “were confusing and prejudicial to defendant.” In order properly to consider this reason, I believe it necessary to set *479out: (1) What said instructions are; (2) that objections were made thereto; (3) whether they properly state the law; and (4) whether or not they are confusing and prejudicial.

Instruction No. 10 reads: “The court further instructs the jury that whenever the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fabling v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Koontz v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Sarno v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Lucas v. CraftSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API