Legal Opinion
Broschart v. City of New York
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided March 5, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdlerman, J.
The Appellate Division in this Department recently held that the sheriff of Bronx county, because of his duties in connection with the administration of justice “ too well known and too numerous to mention,” comes specifically within the exception contained in chapter 637 of the Laws of 1932 (the O’Brien Economy Act) exempting the salaries of officers and employees in the Supreme Court from the reductions otherwise authorized thereby. (Hanley v. City of New York, 250 App. Div. 552.) On appeal to the Court of Appeals that decision was unanimously affirmed, without opinion (275 N. Y. 482).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York City Employees' Retirement System v. EliotNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- New York Telephone Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Cox v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Commissioner of Welfare of City of N.Y. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Hanley v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Isereau v. StoneNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Liquifin Aktiengesellschaft v. BrennanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Thomas v. County of OntarioNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Broschart v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Isereau v. StoneNew York Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.