State v. Phimmachak
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
The jury convicted Vilasak Phimmachak of taking and riding in a motor vehicle without permission. *12He appeals, claiming that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury that the State was required to prove he knew the car was stolen before getting into it. But because we agree with the trial court that such an instruction misstates the law, we affirm.
FACTS
The police lifted Phimmachak’s fingerprints from the driver’s side door of Malcolm Lord’s stolen pickup truck. The police found the abandoned truck just hours after Lord had reported it stolen from an Everett cinema parking…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. PettittWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- State v. TrepanierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2023
- Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014