Legal Opinion
Polidori v. Kordys, Puzio & Di Tomasso
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 3, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
LANDAU, J.A.D.
On leave granted Polidori Construction Co. and its sole owner, Louis Polidori, collectively and individually referred to hereafter as “Polidori,” appeal from the Law Division grant of motions for summary judgment favorable to defendants-respondents Kordys, Puzio & Di Tomasso AIA (Kordys) and Superior Mill Work Co., Inc. (Superior). The case previously had been *390remanded for trial on issues specified in Polidori v. Kordys, Puzio & Di Tomasso, 217 N.J.Super. 424 (App.Div.1987).
Polidori was the owner of a two family house in which a family…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Aronsohn v. MandaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- TODD AND COMPANY, INC. and Thomas K. Langbein, Petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Port Auth. of New York v. Honeywell Prot. Serv.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Young v. STEINBERGSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glass v. Suburban Restoration Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998