Legal Opinion

Ross v. Board of Review

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 27, 1984Published

1Per curiam

Claimant appeals from a final decision of respondent Board of Review holding him ineligible for disability benefits from June 17, 1982 through October 24, 1982, and liable to refund $700 received as benefits. The appeals examiner found that claimant was not under the care of “a legally licensed physician, dentist, podiatrist or chiropractor” as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-39(d),1 and thus ineligible for disability benefits. We agree and affirm that determination.

*469 The medical report filed on behalf of claimant had been certified by a psychologist, not one of the enumerated professions. Claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Cas. Co. v. KnucklesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Iorio v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMP. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Thomas v. Carlton Hosiery MillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API