Legal Opinion

Mighty Dreams LLC v. Shenzhen Beianen Automotive Supplies Co Ltd et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 12, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00793Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 MIGHTY DREAMS LLC, CASE NO. C24-00793-KKE 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 10 SHENZHEN BEIANEN AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES CO LTD et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Plaintiff Mighty Dreams LLC (“Mighty Dreams”) moves for a second time for default 14 judgment on its false advertising claims. Dkt. No. 32. Mighty Dreams, a vendor of knife 15 sharpening stones, alleges that Defendants set false bargain prices on their knife sharpening stones 16 to game Amazon’s Buy Box and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Balbir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Republic of IraqCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API