Legal Opinion

People v. Irvin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1996No. F022671PublishedCited by 22 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WISEMAN, J.

In this case we address a variety of challenges to the three strikes law and several sentencing issues. We affirm the convictions and remand for resentencing.

Procedural Summary

By information filed on May 19, 1994, defendant was charged with burglary (count 1; Pen. Code, 1 § 459), assault with a deadly weapon (count 2; § 245, subd. (a)(1)), false imprisonment (count 3; § 236), 15 counts of anal/genital penetration with a foreign object (counts 4-18; § 289, subd. (a)), 5 counts of oral copulation (counts 19-23; § 288a, subd. (c)), sexual battery (count 24; § 243.4, subd. (a))…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. PlazaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. Sperling, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. GarzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. McPhersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. McPhersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API