Legal Opinion

Shevin v. Venderbush Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1937No. Docket No. 109, Calendar No. 39,470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

This is an appeal from an order quashing writs of garnishment issued in an assumpsit action. There was no trial on the merits. The garnishment writs were quashed on the motion of the principal defendant, the motion alleging:

“1. That writs of garnishment are fatally defective because they are based upon an affidavit signed and notarized on November 19,1936, whereas the affidavit was filed on November 20, 1936, when the writs of garnishment were issued.
“2. That the declaration filed in this cause of action is based upon a breach of contract and the only amount that the plaintiff can possibly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Wellover v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Millard v. Lenawee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Clarence Hodson & Co. v. Wills Sainte ClaireMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Fessenden v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NC + Hybrids v. Growers Seed Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Robert W. Irwin Co. v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
  4. State Code Agencies Education Ass'n v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API