Jones v. . Craddock

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the court below erred in granting the motion for nonsuit. It therefore becomes necessary to examine the evidence presented in support of plaintiff’s action in order to determine whether it was of sufficient probative force to be submitted to the jury. On this motion the evidence is to be considered in its most favorable light for the plaintiff. Teseneer v. Mills Co., 209 N. C., 615.

The plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that sbe was tbe owner of a registered pedigreed Sealyham Terrier dog, answering to the name of “Jimmy Whiskers.”…