K. H. Choy v. Butler's, Inc., a Corporation and Clifford Marks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The sole question presented is whether or not the district court abused its discretion in entering a conditional order of dismissal after hearing from both parties in open court upon a call of the calendar. Appellant agreed to the entry of the order which he now attacks on this appeal. For a period of ninety days he could have restored his case to activity by certifying he was ready for trial. If he was not ready, he could have, before the ninety day period expired, regularly and properly moved for an extension of time. He did neither, but allowed the ninety days to elapse. Through his own…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Joann Zaddack v. A.B. Dick CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Himalayan Industries v. Gibson Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Himalayan Industries & Richard G. Mack v. Gibson Manufacturing Co. & Colin C. Gibson, Himalayan Industries & Richard G. MacK Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees v. Gibson Manufacturing Co. & Colin C. Gibson, Plaintiffs-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965