Legal Opinion
Terson Co., Inc. v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 22, 1982No. 81 C 4176PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGARR, Chief Judge.
This is an action for a preliminary injunction in which the plaintiff The Terson Company (“Terson”) seeks to enjoin the defendants, the Trustees of Local 734 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “Trustees”) from collecting, declaring a default or commencing arbitration on any dispute with the plaintiff concerning payment of “withdrawal liability” demanded from Terson by the Trustees as authorized by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1380, as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Flying Tiger Line, a Delaware Corporation, Tiger International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Warren Transport, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, & Counterdefendants v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, A/K/A Teamsters Pension Plan of Philadelphia and Vicinity, and Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., Counterplaintiffs v. Central States, Southwest and Southeast Areas Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Local 641 Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, and Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Each Sued Individually and as a Member of a Class of Similarly Situated Multiemployer Pension Plans Who Assert Withdrawal Liability, Against Hall's Motor Transit Company, Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Appeal of the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International Inc. And Warren Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Loran W. Robbins, Cross-Appellants v. McNicholas Transportation Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- T.I.M.E.-DC, Inc. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Clinton Engines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.