Legal Opinion

Rinker v. City of Fairfax

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 1989No. Record 870500PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

In this land use controversy involving conditional zoning, we decide whether the trial court correctly sustained a local governing body’s demurrer and properly ruled that a landowner had failed to exhaust administrative remedies before mounting a judicial attack on the validity of zoning legislation.

Appellants Jack E. Rinker and David E. Feldman, trustees, and Judicial Drive Associates, a general partnership (collectively, the landowner), filed a bill of complaint for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against appellees City of Fairfax, its Council, and its zoning administrator…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BOARD OF SUP'RS, ETC. v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Gayton Triangle Land Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  3. Chesterfield Civic Ass'n v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  4. National Memorial Park, Inc. v. Board of ZoningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. BD. OF SUP'RS OF HENRICO CTY. v. Market InnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Notestein v. Board of Supervisors of Appomattox CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Lilly v. Caroline CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. Vulcan Materials Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  4. Notestein v. BOARD OF SUP'RSSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  5. Board of County Supervisors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API