Rinker v. City of Fairfax
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton
In this land use controversy involving conditional zoning, we decide whether the trial court correctly sustained a local governing body’s demurrer and properly ruled that a landowner had failed to exhaust administrative remedies before mounting a judicial attack on the validity of zoning legislation.
Appellants Jack E. Rinker and David E. Feldman, trustees, and Judicial Drive Associates, a general partnership (collectively, the landowner), filed a bill of complaint for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against appellees City of Fairfax, its Council, and its zoning administrator…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- BOARD OF SUP'RS, ETC. v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Gayton Triangle Land Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Chesterfield Civic Ass'n v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- National Memorial Park, Inc. v. Board of ZoningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- BD. OF SUP'RS OF HENRICO CTY. v. Market InnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- Notestein v. Board of Supervisors of Appomattox CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Lilly v. Caroline CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Notestein v. BOARD OF SUP'RSSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Board of County Supervisors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.