United States v. Brito
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), the Supreme Court barred the admission of testimonial hearsay in a criminal case under circumstances in which the accused has not had an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant. This ruling effected a sea change in the jurisprudence of the Confrontation Clause—but the Court left open the parameters of testimonial hearsay, and so its ruling produced a miasma of uncertainty. We enter this murky milieu to answer a question of first impression in this circuit: under what circumstances should an…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. AntonakopoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. MaherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. De La CruzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Jerome HadleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.