Legal Opinion

Young v. Hefton

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 21, 2007No. 97,614PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

Michael R. Young appeals the district court’s judgment against him on his claim for specific performance of a contract to purchase a tract of real estate resulting from his bid at an auction (tract 3). Edward G. Hefton, and other members of the Hefton family who were the sellers at that auction, cross-appeal the district court’s judgment of specific performance in favor of Young on a different tract of real estate placed at auction by the Heftons (tract 4). We affirm the district court’s conclusion that there was no contract formed on tract 3, but that an enforceable contract was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Theis v. duPont, Glore Forgan Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Barnhart v. McKinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. M West, Inc. v. Oak Park Mall, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. Biegler v. KraftDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2013
  3. Kevin Coffey v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of OklahomaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Les Industries Wipeco, Inc. v. Bluestem Management Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  5. M West, Inc. v. Oak Park Mall, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API