Legal Opinion
Hardwick v. Moore
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 5, 2001No. 1D00-251PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants are inmates at Union Correctional Institute. They have filed a two-count declaratory judgment complaint challenging Rule 33-3.02(9)(d), Florida Administrative Code (subsequently renumbered as Rule 33-501.401(10)(d)). The trial court dismissed the complaint with prejudice, concluding (1) the court will not “put limits on the Department of Corrections regulating of the contents of an inmate’s cell,” and (2) plaintiffs failed to show that they “suffered any damages.” We conclude that Count I of the complaint states a cause of action. Accordingly we reverse and remand for further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santa Rosa Cty. v. ADMIN. COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Sarkis v. Pafford Oil Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Bell v. Associated Independents, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Platt v. General Development CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Lutz Lake Fern Road Neighborhood Groups, Inc. v. Hillsborough CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ENVIRONMENTAL CONFED. OF SOUTHWEST FL., INC. v. IMC Phosphates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Charles J. Davis v. Bay County Jail, Sheriff, Frank McKeithenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Charles J. Davis v. Bay County Jail, Sheriff, Frank McKeithenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014