Legal Opinion

Marr v. Hicks

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 1, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

Two cases tried together, and arising out of an automobile accident. Etta M. Marr, the plaintiff in one, was a passenger in the car driven by her husband, Ellsworth C. Marr, the plaintiff in the other suit. Mrs. Marr recovered a verdict of $1500 for pain and suffering and for loss of wages for her personal labor as an employee in a shoe shop. The latter element of damage is alleged in her declaration, and her right to recover therefor, if entitled to damages at all, is not disputed. R. S., Chap. 74, Sec. 3. The declaration in the writ of Ellsworth C. Marr alleges in two counts damages to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Loftus v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Williams v. HolbrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Barret v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Britton v. DubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  2. Shannon v. BakerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  3. Parker v. KnoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. Duchaine Ex Rel. Duchaine v. FortinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  5. McCarthy v. McKechnieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API