Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Advance Alarms, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 2009No. 106,989PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, V.C.J.
¶ 1 Plaintiff, Robert Reynolds, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against his former employer, Advanced Alarms, Inc., defendant, and its principal owner, Robert Morrison, individual defendant. Reynolds claimed his former employer violated the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and the public policy of Oklahoma when the employer allegedly fired him for contacting the Oklahoma Department of Labor with an inquiry about his employer’s lunch-break policy. The defendants moved for summary judgment.
¶2 On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Gilmore v. Enogex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- McCrady v. Oklahoma Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Shero v. Grand Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tufaro v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- HO v. TULSA SPINE & SPECIALTY HOSPITALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Hagen v. Siouxland Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- BOOTH v. HOME DEPOTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- BOOTH v. HOME DEPOTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.