Legal Opinion
(PS) Schmitz v. Asman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 3, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-DJC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 ADAM ASMAN, et al., (ECF Nos. 255, 264) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs Thomas Schmitz and Dianne Mallia1 brought this civil rights action under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 42(b) and 26(d), defendants move to 20 bifurcate trial and for a partial stay of discovery. Defendants seek to bifurcate trial of issues of 21 liability and compensatory damages from trial of the amount of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ellingson Timber Company v. Great Northern Railway Company, a Corporation, and Western Pacific Railroadcompany, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. California Psychiatric TransitionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.