Legal Opinion

Woolley v. City of Natchez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1937No. 8264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellee, City of Natchez, obtained a decree that appellant Woolley, as receiver of the Britton & Koontz National Bank of Natchez pay over $5,125 in his hands belonging to the city. The District Court found as a fact “that the money furnished by the City of Natchez on the 15th of February, 1933, was furnished Britton & Koontz National Bank for the specific purpose of paying coupons and bonds that were falling due on that date under the terms and conditions of their issuance, and which would be presented to Britton & Koontz National Bank for payment, it being the place…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Wisdom v. KeenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  3. Washington Loan & Banking Co. v. Fourth Nat. Bank of MaconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  4. Gulley v. WisdomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  5. Webster v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. In re Kountze Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API